"All right, but apart from the sanitation, the medicine, education, wine, public order, irrigation, roads, a fresh water system, and public health, what have the Romans ever done for us?"
Here's a link to my substack if you're all interested; I've named myself in honor of Capt. Jack Harkness (my favorite Dr. Who character) whom I'd like to emulate in every way -- except for the gay parts.. What happened to my brother Paul is too piteous to describe..😥
My thoughts looking at this again - not that it's especially pertinent - are that surely at some point people must have looked at this problem of control in a beneficent way; that it was a problem that had a solution with a fair outcome when implemented? We've never seen this. We've only ever seen the control system tyrannically applied and tightening its thumb screws so tight that even the torturers don't like it. It really is very strange that not one single facet of the control grid is keeping even an eye out for a fairer - possibly even more economical (?) - solution. Almost everything else they touch is gamed to within an inch of its life, but not the type of control system they want? It's bizarre! Why should the very mechanism of control be hors limites for questioning or even making suggestions - let alone suggestions that might improve the lot of the people bearing these burdens - when everything else is reexamined practically monthly? Did Plato just find the perfect solution one day and no one has dared question it since?
I like your thoughts Christian. How can the 10% convince the 89.9% that the less than 1% WHO controls them may also want to cull them or even convert change them into something else ?
Which is rather chilling when you think how cheap centurions must have been. (And if you are taxing your populus then they, of course, are costing you nothing personally.) What did centurions get tickets to in Roman times, apart from the Colosseum? Or were a few visits to the temple "virgins" the only extravagance?
ROADS. In his "History of Britain," (1848) R W Morgan says:
"In addition to being one of the founders of British Legislation, Dyvnwal designed and partly made the Royal British Military Roads through the Island. These were nine in number:
1. The Sarn Gwyddelin (corrupted into Watling Street), or Irish Road, in two branches, from Dover to Mona (Anglesey) and Penvro.
2. The Sam Iken (Iknield street), the road from Caer Troia (London), northward through the Eastern districts.
3. Sam Ucha (Iknield street), from the mouth of the Tyne to the present St. David's.
4. Sam Ermyn, from Anderida (Pevensey) to Caer Edin (Edinburgh).
5. Sam Achmaen, from Caer Troia to Menevia (St. David's).
6. Sam Halen, from the Salt Mines of Cheshire to the mouth of the Humber.
7 Sam Hàlen, from the Salt Mines to Llongborth (Portsmouth).
8. The Second Sam Ermyn, from Torbay to Dunbreton on the Clyde.
9. The Sam ar y Môr, or military road following the coast around the Island.
These roads were pitched and paved, and ran sometimes in a straight, sometimes a sinuous line, at a moderate elevation above the ground, forming a network of communication between the cities of Britain. Being completed by Belinus, they are known as the Belinian roads of Britain. The Romans followed these lines in their first and second invasions, and subsequently laid down in great measure their own military roads upon them. Hence the Belinian and Roman roads are found constantly running in and out of each other."
It's great, isn't it? I didn't know any of this beyond possibly something about Watling Street. In spite of my lavishly expensive education I really am coming round to the idea that we are taught absolutely nothing. As you might imagine I usually defend this type of accusation saying that we have to pass the exams to get in (not to mention forking out the cash for a dozen years at about £15k a term) and it's not just a privileged boat ride, heading forever upstream. But somehow the £2k a week regime didn't cover 9/10ths of what I might reasonably be expected to know. Nor was it actually that long ago that this was common knowledge (1850s). We don't seem to have any problem hauling the 170 year-old corpse of evolution around when it suits them, do we? And there's something that needs a little bit more than a pinprick to keep it going for the show ...
Yes, the problem is that we are not educated. We are schooled in what they want us to know rather than in truth. It's yet another control mechanism, like religion, the law and the rest :(
Strangely enough I had some fleeting thoughts earlier today about how any form of education (certainly public but it might well include private too) is a sign of a control society. There's a similar thing with money and slave societies (or planets, to keep it close to home). Education is not only aggressively intrusive and inimical to free will, but it's now of negative utility and they aren't even bothering to offer a fig leaf's worth of material to cover up its true aim of churning out brainwashed and obedient workers. Most of the Gen Zs I come across couldn't think their way out of a paper bag; that is, when they're not channelling the Largactylites.
Rome never fell and still is in power today. People can't fathom this because they think men who have power are incapable of evil deeds. This is why people say get rid of patriarchy. Men in power is this. This crazy dumb false reality about what people are suppose to be doing in their lives when they purposely keep real knowledge like seven hermetic laws out of school. If kids learn that in elementary. No telling what the future holds. If people understand how reality and the world works. Dams and highways work against this way of life. We're living a foreign way of life on this planet
Close to the root of the problem lies in the formation and motivations behind social hierarchy and the inequality that naturally comes out of that relationship structure. Riane Eisler has a pretty good take on it in her book The Chalice and the Blade.
The natives on this land weren't destroying it the way they are now. It's all for power and control of spirituality. Having the most money doesn't do anything for people with the most money. What else is left to control after money? Things that shouldn't be controlled by men and im A man
Anatoly Fomenko, I think. He's the one who has re-ordered history taking out the 700 or 1000 years that is supposed to have been added to our timeline. Whether his arrangement actually lines up seems to be a bit patchy though I've never found (or looked that hard) any of his books. It explains the odd dating on some coins and buildings; Eg. i695 for 1695, with the 'i' standing for iesus or "Year of our Lord ..." more colloquially. I'm drawn to the idea of Jason Jack's (the guy whose videos I have just sent you) of the dates being adjusted to mark the foundation of the Roman Empire in 625BC and the date of its fall being moved to 476AD from, he says, 76AD, making it contemporaneous with the fall of Jerusalem. However, when I did look at this date shifting - now well over 10 years ago - I didn't find many striking new alignments at all; in fact hardly any. Also, Jason Breshears of Archaix, whose entire work is the alignment of multiple world calendrical systems, doesn't seem to think it's needed and certainly doesn't seem to have talked much about it, though I'm not a regular watcher these days. Having said that, I do wonder how many data points he actually has between, say, 500AD and 1500AD. Quite simply, there isn't a lot of known history in that period and certainly not enough to do direct mappings between continents. (Fomenko takes the position that the "history" in this period is just a copy and paste job of other historical figures with minor changes; and usually based on Charlemagne.)
The Chinese talk of tall red haired people who influenced them. They referred to them as 'the ancients'. Apparently they taught farming, counting, writing and many other skills. There have been bodies excavated from the Gobi Desert which match that description and the clothing was very like tartan. However well I remember the articles is of little use because they have been scrubbed from the internet!
I suspect the CCP has an aversion to historical investigation because they have a desire to frame Chinese history in a very “us against them” fashion. I also discovered overt efforts to discourage research on connections to outsiders via the Silk Road over the course of my fascination with all the connections that popped up around the famous Loulan Beauty.
Incidentally, when I attended an exhibition in Taiwan that featured her, both myself and a companion were at different times overwhelmed by a sense of repulsion and revulsion, as if she didn’t want anyone looking at her.
Many thanks for naming this mummy correctly so that I was able to locate the information I was seeking. I doubt if it was CCP who hid the articles I was looking for online. Our own governments are not exactly averse to limiting information about China.
Sorry if I wasn't clear. It wasn't censorship of existing work or writing that I was getting at. I don't recall exactly the details of the circumstances, but PRC "authorities" do not take kindly to non-Chinese scholars researching and investigating the mummies of the desert. I vaguely remember interested parties hoping to look into the foreign origins of the Loulan Beauty 樓蘭美女 and related history getting stonewalled and thwarted in their efforts.
PRC officialdom has a fragile psyche, if that makes sense to describe a political entity. They take great pains to encourage and portray a very Sino-centric worldview to the people of the PRC, and often frame Chinese history as a series of encounters with foreign bullies. Apart from a victimhood spin on the historical narrative, this also leads to a tendency to scrub Chinese history of foreign influences in the sense that, apart from visiting exploitation and death upon China in various instances such as the Opium Wars (thank you, Sassoon family and the British East India Company), the outside world's presence and influence is minimized.
Having lived in the PRC quite a few years ago, I know very well how control over the issue of visas, work permits and travel can be used to control scholarship, journalism, and the flow of information in general. Known researchers interested in investigating the Loulan Beauty and her Celtic-looking relatives simply do not get visas to China or permission to work there.
PODCAST WITH JERM WARFARE:
https://open.substack.com/pub/francesleader/p/the-black-nobility-podcast
According to Phillip K Dick, (and I would have to agree with him…) the Empire never ended.
It is evident that you did not read the linked post which says exactly that.
Didn't have to read it, I absorbed it!
Wow! Thank you! 🤩
Further to our earlier exchange... Thought you'd enjoy this 😘:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0lczHvB3Y9s
"All right, but apart from the sanitation, the medicine, education, wine, public order, irrigation, roads, a fresh water system, and public health, what have the Romans ever done for us?"
-- Monty Python "The Life of Brian"
Yes, did you not notice that I included that clip at the start of the article and then proceeded to prove it was all a big fat lie?
Sorry, no... 😥
It was rather late in the day when I posted that.. I think..
But it was the entire theme of the post! 😂🙄
I'm hopeless, sometimes.. 🙄
💛💚💙 you should see me when I get the wrong end of the stick.... I can be a total tit in a trance!
Obviously happens to the best of us dear! 😘
Here's a link to my substack if you're all interested; I've named myself in honor of Capt. Jack Harkness (my favorite Dr. Who character) whom I'd like to emulate in every way -- except for the gay parts.. What happened to my brother Paul is too piteous to describe..😥
https://captroyharkness.substack.com/
So the Romans creating Sheeple in the form of Christians too feed to the Lions for entertainment was really just about control.
My thoughts looking at this again - not that it's especially pertinent - are that surely at some point people must have looked at this problem of control in a beneficent way; that it was a problem that had a solution with a fair outcome when implemented? We've never seen this. We've only ever seen the control system tyrannically applied and tightening its thumb screws so tight that even the torturers don't like it. It really is very strange that not one single facet of the control grid is keeping even an eye out for a fairer - possibly even more economical (?) - solution. Almost everything else they touch is gamed to within an inch of its life, but not the type of control system they want? It's bizarre! Why should the very mechanism of control be hors limites for questioning or even making suggestions - let alone suggestions that might improve the lot of the people bearing these burdens - when everything else is reexamined practically monthly? Did Plato just find the perfect solution one day and no one has dared question it since?
I like your thoughts Christian. How can the 10% convince the 89.9% that the less than 1% WHO controls them may also want to cull them or even convert change them into something else ?
Freedom is obviously a terrifying prospect to a tyrant. Even his own freedom.
Mind control is cheaper than centurions.
Which is rather chilling when you think how cheap centurions must have been. (And if you are taxing your populus then they, of course, are costing you nothing personally.) What did centurions get tickets to in Roman times, apart from the Colosseum? Or were a few visits to the temple "virgins" the only extravagance?
ROADS. In his "History of Britain," (1848) R W Morgan says:
"In addition to being one of the founders of British Legislation, Dyvnwal designed and partly made the Royal British Military Roads through the Island. These were nine in number:
1. The Sarn Gwyddelin (corrupted into Watling Street), or Irish Road, in two branches, from Dover to Mona (Anglesey) and Penvro.
2. The Sam Iken (Iknield street), the road from Caer Troia (London), northward through the Eastern districts.
3. Sam Ucha (Iknield street), from the mouth of the Tyne to the present St. David's.
4. Sam Ermyn, from Anderida (Pevensey) to Caer Edin (Edinburgh).
5. Sam Achmaen, from Caer Troia to Menevia (St. David's).
6. Sam Halen, from the Salt Mines of Cheshire to the mouth of the Humber.
7 Sam Hàlen, from the Salt Mines to Llongborth (Portsmouth).
8. The Second Sam Ermyn, from Torbay to Dunbreton on the Clyde.
9. The Sam ar y Môr, or military road following the coast around the Island.
These roads were pitched and paved, and ran sometimes in a straight, sometimes a sinuous line, at a moderate elevation above the ground, forming a network of communication between the cities of Britain. Being completed by Belinus, they are known as the Belinian roads of Britain. The Romans followed these lines in their first and second invasions, and subsequently laid down in great measure their own military roads upon them. Hence the Belinian and Roman roads are found constantly running in and out of each other."
https://www.thenationalcv.org.uk/More%2016%20History%20of%20Britain%20%20by%20R%20W%20MORGAN%20(1848)%20(2).pdf (pp.25-26)
I was hoping you would add some more British history to this post, Tirion! You are a star, as always! xx
It's great, isn't it? I didn't know any of this beyond possibly something about Watling Street. In spite of my lavishly expensive education I really am coming round to the idea that we are taught absolutely nothing. As you might imagine I usually defend this type of accusation saying that we have to pass the exams to get in (not to mention forking out the cash for a dozen years at about £15k a term) and it's not just a privileged boat ride, heading forever upstream. But somehow the £2k a week regime didn't cover 9/10ths of what I might reasonably be expected to know. Nor was it actually that long ago that this was common knowledge (1850s). We don't seem to have any problem hauling the 170 year-old corpse of evolution around when it suits them, do we? And there's something that needs a little bit more than a pinprick to keep it going for the show ...
Yes, the problem is that we are not educated. We are schooled in what they want us to know rather than in truth. It's yet another control mechanism, like religion, the law and the rest :(
Strangely enough I had some fleeting thoughts earlier today about how any form of education (certainly public but it might well include private too) is a sign of a control society. There's a similar thing with money and slave societies (or planets, to keep it close to home). Education is not only aggressively intrusive and inimical to free will, but it's now of negative utility and they aren't even bothering to offer a fig leaf's worth of material to cover up its true aim of churning out brainwashed and obedient workers. Most of the Gen Zs I come across couldn't think their way out of a paper bag; that is, when they're not channelling the Largactylites.
Rome never fell and still is in power today. People can't fathom this because they think men who have power are incapable of evil deeds. This is why people say get rid of patriarchy. Men in power is this. This crazy dumb false reality about what people are suppose to be doing in their lives when they purposely keep real knowledge like seven hermetic laws out of school. If kids learn that in elementary. No telling what the future holds. If people understand how reality and the world works. Dams and highways work against this way of life. We're living a foreign way of life on this planet
Agreed.
Close to the root of the problem lies in the formation and motivations behind social hierarchy and the inequality that naturally comes out of that relationship structure. Riane Eisler has a pretty good take on it in her book The Chalice and the Blade.
The natives on this land weren't destroying it the way they are now. It's all for power and control of spirituality. Having the most money doesn't do anything for people with the most money. What else is left to control after money? Things that shouldn't be controlled by men and im A man
There are fools in both sexes.... some of the highest ranking Black Nobility are women.
And true cruelty is a much bigger problem in women than it is in men - perhaps because women can't usually just thump someone when they get angry.
Those BITCHES! Worf, worf!
Lol. I watched Monty Python and the Holy Grail but I'm not familiar with the others. I'll need to set aside some time in the future to watch the rest.
But yeah it looks like everything is leading towards more war, chaos, and control.
Great post!
And here I thought Romans were a kind of lettuce.
'cos you would, wouldn't you?!
https://media1.tenor.com/m/F7W2e2odz_0AAAAC/dual-universe-du.gif
"Men at some time are masters of their fates: The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars, But in ourselves, that we are underlings…..”
————Julius Caesar I
Where did the myth that America has any sort of Empire come from? It has no more validity that the existence of the British Empire before it!
Both these titles are utter nonsense because they disguise the real owners of Empire!
Please read:
https://francesleader.substack.com/p/black-nobility-101
hi, yy for your writings.
look for anatomi flamenco and his team have written 3 books on the non-exiistence of the roman enpire
Are you sure of that spelling? I cannot find a reference to this person.
Anatoly Fomenko, I think. He's the one who has re-ordered history taking out the 700 or 1000 years that is supposed to have been added to our timeline. Whether his arrangement actually lines up seems to be a bit patchy though I've never found (or looked that hard) any of his books. It explains the odd dating on some coins and buildings; Eg. i695 for 1695, with the 'i' standing for iesus or "Year of our Lord ..." more colloquially. I'm drawn to the idea of Jason Jack's (the guy whose videos I have just sent you) of the dates being adjusted to mark the foundation of the Roman Empire in 625BC and the date of its fall being moved to 476AD from, he says, 76AD, making it contemporaneous with the fall of Jerusalem. However, when I did look at this date shifting - now well over 10 years ago - I didn't find many striking new alignments at all; in fact hardly any. Also, Jason Breshears of Archaix, whose entire work is the alignment of multiple world calendrical systems, doesn't seem to think it's needed and certainly doesn't seem to have talked much about it, though I'm not a regular watcher these days. Having said that, I do wonder how many data points he actually has between, say, 500AD and 1500AD. Quite simply, there isn't a lot of known history in that period and certainly not enough to do direct mappings between continents. (Fomenko takes the position that the "history" in this period is just a copy and paste job of other historical figures with minor changes; and usually based on Charlemagne.)
"Jason Jack's (the guy whose videos I have just sent you)" - WHERE HAVE YOU SENT ME VIDEOS? I can't find any!
Just links rather than physical. In your email. I think it's titled "Interesting Video". xx
Thanks Frances. Who did I get this myth from? American Left wing writers…circa 1960s.
🤣😂🙄
The American Empire is football and horrible beer.
Splitter!
;-)
🤣😂
The Chinese talk of tall red haired people who influenced them. They referred to them as 'the ancients'. Apparently they taught farming, counting, writing and many other skills. There have been bodies excavated from the Gobi Desert which match that description and the clothing was very like tartan. However well I remember the articles is of little use because they have been scrubbed from the internet!
I suspect the CCP has an aversion to historical investigation because they have a desire to frame Chinese history in a very “us against them” fashion. I also discovered overt efforts to discourage research on connections to outsiders via the Silk Road over the course of my fascination with all the connections that popped up around the famous Loulan Beauty.
Incidentally, when I attended an exhibition in Taiwan that featured her, both myself and a companion were at different times overwhelmed by a sense of repulsion and revulsion, as if she didn’t want anyone looking at her.
Many thanks for naming this mummy correctly so that I was able to locate the information I was seeking. I doubt if it was CCP who hid the articles I was looking for online. Our own governments are not exactly averse to limiting information about China.
https://listverse.com/2012/11/01/the-sleeping-beauty-of-loulan/
Sorry if I wasn't clear. It wasn't censorship of existing work or writing that I was getting at. I don't recall exactly the details of the circumstances, but PRC "authorities" do not take kindly to non-Chinese scholars researching and investigating the mummies of the desert. I vaguely remember interested parties hoping to look into the foreign origins of the Loulan Beauty 樓蘭美女 and related history getting stonewalled and thwarted in their efforts.
PRC officialdom has a fragile psyche, if that makes sense to describe a political entity. They take great pains to encourage and portray a very Sino-centric worldview to the people of the PRC, and often frame Chinese history as a series of encounters with foreign bullies. Apart from a victimhood spin on the historical narrative, this also leads to a tendency to scrub Chinese history of foreign influences in the sense that, apart from visiting exploitation and death upon China in various instances such as the Opium Wars (thank you, Sassoon family and the British East India Company), the outside world's presence and influence is minimized.
Having lived in the PRC quite a few years ago, I know very well how control over the issue of visas, work permits and travel can be used to control scholarship, journalism, and the flow of information in general. Known researchers interested in investigating the Loulan Beauty and her Celtic-looking relatives simply do not get visas to China or permission to work there.
May I introduce you to one of my favourite on-line commentators, Asha Logos?
https://ashalogos.com/videos/15
Bit "right-wing" for most people's taste, but personally, I adore him! 😍
You can also find him on Bitchute, Odysee, Rumble, and amazingly still, on YouTube